Evaluation methods for master degree thesis of School of electronic information and electrical engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University (Trial)
Chapter I General Provisions
Chinese link: http://yjwb.seiee.sjtu.edu.cn/yjwb/info/14649.htm
Article 1 The first thesis is the concentrated embodiment of master's scientific research ability and training quality. In order to improve the overall quality of the master's degree thesis of the College of electronic information and electrical engineering, do a more objective and fair job in the examination and evaluation of the dissertation, and ensure the quality of the degree award, this evaluation method is formulated according to the spirit of the relevant documents of the University and the college.
Article 2 the Institute of electric power shall implement the system of double open examination before the defense of master's degree thesis.
Chapter II evaluation methods
Article 3 the format of dissertations shall refer to the guidelines for writing doctoral and master's dissertations of Shanghai Jiaotong University.
Article 4 the dissertation evaluation is generally conducted one and a half months before the oral defense, and is composed of two open examination papers. The format of the open examination thesis shall refer to the requirements for the evaluation format of Shanghai Jiaotong University thesis.
Article 5 on civilization review, two peer experts with intermediate or higher professional titles (including experts with intermediate professional titles with master's training qualification) shall be employed by their discipline (for those who apply for master's degree with the same educational level, three peer experts shall be employed, one of whom is a specialist outside the University and the unit to which the applicant belongs). The Secretary designated by the discipline shall be responsible for the distribution, collection, summary and feedback of the evaluation opinions and results of the open examination papers, and the authors of the papers shall not participate.
Article 6 the Institute suggests that all departments under it should formulate a blind examination system according to the actual situation, so as to ensure the quality of dissertations. Special attention should be paid to those who apply for master's degree with the same academic level, new supervisors, the first batch of postgraduates with newly added majors (including newly added professional degrees), and those who have graduated before or after extension.
Article 7 in order to avoid the unfair phenomenon in the evaluation of dissertations due to academic viewpoints and other reasons, postgraduates and their supervisors may propose the institutions or experts that need to be avoided in the evaluation of their dissertations, up to two universities or three experts.
Article 8 the evaluation elements of academic master's degree thesis and professional master's degree thesis are shown in the following table respectively:
Evaluation index (100 points for each item) | Evaluation elements of academic master's degree thesis |
Topic selection (10%) | The subject frontier and pioneering of the topic selection On the theoretical and practical significance of economic, social and scientific development |
Journals overview (10%)
| The comprehensiveness of the review, the reflection and understanding of the development of the discipline at home and abroad, and the organization of the induction and summary |
Basic knowledge (20%) | The solid and broad degree of basic theory The systematicness and depth of professional knowledge |
Scientific research ability and innovation (50%) | The scientificity of research methods and the sufficiency of citation materials The author's ability to engage in scientific research The level and value of the research results |
Writing quality (10%) | Reasonable structure, strong logic, accurate and fluent expression, standard writing The quotation is standard and the style of study is rigorous |
Article 9 the papers with single unqualified (any single item < 60 points) or overall unqualified (total score < 60 points) in the evaluation results of open examination are dissenting papers. Dissenting papers shall be executed in accordance with the measures for handling dissertations of the second division of Engineering Science, Shanghai Jiaotong University. Those who have passed the review can apply for thesis defense.
Chapter III measures for blind trial at the hospital level
Article 10 for the master's degree theses applied for defense, the Institute shall implement a double-blind evaluation system (hereinafter referred to as blind review) combining random sampling and key spot check before defense.
Random sampling was carried out by electronic lottery according to a certain proportion.
The main objects of random inspection are as follows: the first batch of applicants for master's degree who are to be granted with new tutors and new majors (including newly added professional degrees); the applicants for master's degree who are punished by demerit recording or staying in the school for observation; the master's degree applicants under the guidance of tutors whose number of graduate students reaches 6 or more in the current year; and the mid-term examination fails for the first time In the past year, the quality problems of the tutor who guided the graduate students in the previous year; the master's degree applicants whose thesis duplicate checking rate is close to the upper limit of each major; part-time master's degree applicants; master's degree candidates who graduate in advance or postponed.
Article 11 The Graduate Educational Administration Office of the second academic department is entrusted by the degree evaluation committee of the second academic department to organize and implement the blind review of the master's degree thesis of the Institute. The blind review paper is the thesis review draft that passes the repetition rate detection and the supervisor and department audit in the postgraduate information management system. The Graduate Educational Administration Office of the Institute of electric power will arrange three experts who have the same or similar discipline direction with the application for the degree Review. If the thesis is selected by the college for college level blind examination, it does not affect the process of the student's open examination and application for defense.
Article 12 in the hospital level blind review, if two or more of the three peer experts' comments are "unqualified" (i.e. the evaluation results are single unqualified (any single item < 60 points) or the overall evaluation results are unqualified (total score < 60 points)), the paper is considered as "existing problems" academic papers. If there is only one evaluation opinion "unqualified" in the evaluation result of the college level blind review, it shall be carried out in accordance with the "handling measures for dissenting dissertations of the second division of Engineering Science, Shanghai Jiaotong University". If the reconsideration still fails to pass in accordance with the handling process of dissenting dissertations of the second academic department, the thesis shall be deemed as "existing problems".
Article 13 the master's degree theses that have been identified as "existing problems" shall be dealt with as follows:
1. Suspend the postgraduate enrollment qualification of the instructor for the corresponding degree type for one year, and the college will conduct quality interview with the person in charge of his or her department;
2. Reduce the enrollment index of the corresponding degree level and type of the Department in the next year: 6 / each article; deduct the corresponding resources of the tutor's unit at the end of the year;
3. If the total number of theses of master's degree with "problems" of the same instructor reaches more than 3 (including 3), the teacher's qualification to guide master's degree students will be cancelled;
4. If the degree applicant of the "existing problems" dissertation has passed the defense, the defense will be invalid, and it is necessary to continue to revise the thesis according to the experts' opinions for at least half a year, and then implement the "handling measures for objection to dissertations from the second division of Engineering science of Shanghai Jiaotong University" and organize the defense again.
Article 14 the staff participating in the blind review of dissertations shall strictly abide by the "double blind" principle, and shall not disclose the names of postgraduates, supervisors and reviewers to anyone, and the postgraduates and supervisors shall not know the situation of reviewers from any way to hinder the fairness of the evaluation.
Article 15 the standards of dissertation evaluation fees shall be implemented in accordance with the relevant financial regulations of the University.
Article 16 dissertations identified as embezzlement, plagiarism and plagiarism of other people's academic achievements shall be dealt with in accordance with the relevant provisions of the academic norms for graduate students of Shanghai Jiaotong University.
Article 17 these Measures shall be implemented as of January 1, 2019. In case of any inconsistency between the previous relevant provisions and these measures, the present Measures shall prevail. The interpretation of these Measures shall be the responsibility of the Graduate Educational Administration Office of the Institute of electric power.
The SEIEE application form for master thesis blind review and defense电院硕士学位论文抽盲审及答辩审批表